Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : Bob Brinker: Market Savant & Radio Host -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Boca_PETE who wrote (4176)	3/15/1998 10:11:00 PM
From: sea_biscuit	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 42834

When making denials, I've always noticed the president chooses pronouns. For example, "I did not have an improper relationship with HER (rather than naming the person he is referring to). He sometimes uses the person's name in the previous sentence, but there's no assurance inthe denial sentence that the chose pronoun relates to the person named in the previous sentence. (emphasis mine) You begin the third sentence above with a "He". I just want to make sure if you were referring to the President, or His Excellency Jabba the Hutt in this instance! :-) :-) ;-) Dipy.

To: Boca_PETE who wrote (4176)	3/15/1998 10:31:00 PM
From: wooden ships	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 42834

Today, Brinker lamented the extent to which the the office of the President had been debased and demeaned under the current regime given the pending allegations, but thought Republicans ill advised to impeach our so-called Commander-in-Chief since material advantage would then accrue to a then incumbent Pres- ident Gore in an A.D. 2000 election. My own view, that a change of horses in midstream at this juncture would unsettle markets markedly, is certainly not a unique opinion. Parenthetically, I applaud those members of this thread who are standing shoulder to shoulder in the concerted effort to rid ourselves of writers here who have demonstrated an obvious pattern of bad faith, disinterest in the topic at hand, and egregious lack of decorum on this thread. At present, the matter is being taken up with the appropriate Silicon Investor authorities who are known for decisive action and intolerance for overt trouble- makers. In the interim, I urge all ladies and gentlemen of good faith to continue to stand in unison in maintaining the integrity of this thread and adherence to its expressed charter.

To: Boca_PETE who wrote (4176)	3/15/1998 10:43:00 PM
From: Cents	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 42834

Pete, perhaps our President is not very good... with remembering names but only faces. It's probably a standard line for him now. <g> Joe B. thank you for your summary. I missed the show today but will be receiving a mini walkman in a few weeks to carry with me in the future. Cents

To: Boca_PETE who wrote (4176)	3/16/1998 9:32:00 AM
From: mister topes	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 42834

A congenital liar does not know the difference between the truth and the lies. The voters should have picked up on this guy when he said he did not inhale. The sad thing is he could have been a decent President. Unfortunately, this is what we all get when the country elects an Arkansas Bubbadude to the highest office in the land. Kathleen Willey is as credible an individual as you will ever see. She is Bill's worst nightmare come true. An honest woman who finally decided that she was not going to take it anymore. Only God knows how many Kathleen Willey's have refused to come forward for a myriad of personal reasons. Obviously if you come forward they try to destroy you.