SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Biotech / Medical : North American Vaccine -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Rick Strange who wrote (323)3/17/1998 9:59:00 AM
From: andy harrison  Respond to of 507
 
FYI:
Rick Strange admitted on the NVX yahoo board that he made an
error and Denver DID NOT sell any shares of NVX.



To: Rick Strange who wrote (323)3/18/1998 8:21:00 AM
From: Don W Stone  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 507
 
Rick Strange knows damn well right by now that this report on Denver Investment Advisors is totally false yet he hasn't the decency or respect for anyone on this board to correct his own mistake.
I will move over what i posted on the message board on Yahoo over the past two days.
I have yet to find any credability in anything that he has posted on NVX but than I will say that is why I am long and he is short.
This lastest post plus the one on Denmark are just a sample of how desparate he, or perhaps someone else is, to get those that are long to sell. The shorts are in big trouble and time is against them.
I do question were his input and high motivation to drive NVX down really come from. I guess he must be short one hell of alot of stock.
But than he says he has bought calls to hedge. ???????????????

RS; I was about to write your DVI off as a human error but now i do have my doubts. I guess yesterday you were to busy trying to dig up some more dirt. You did find time thou to throw another rock on that message board but you couldn't take the time to be fair to these posters. I do have to wonder just how long would you have gone unchallenged if I hadn't made a check of the validity of your claim.
You mite have gotten away with it. Yes, we are indeed talking about CREDABILITY, YOURS AND NOT JUST DIFFERENCE OF OPINION.