Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks : ACRT about to move to new highs -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Mr. Pink who wrote (3383)	3/15/1998 11:38:00 PM
From: Ryan Plovie (Hijacked)	Respond to of 7054

Growth Rate 75% 8 years of profitability! last 4 quarters TRIPLE DIGIT GROWTH I'll take my chances!

To: Mr. Pink who wrote (3383)	3/15/1998 11:52:00 PM
From: Doug R	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 7054

You're not a drug addict or something, are you? You're temper does not put you in the best light. So, being the former president of a co. is a negative? Sounds like background experience to me. So, being a bookkeeper for a charitable concern is a negative? Sounds like a good thing to me. Amos' past is most likely entirely irrelevant to the prospects of continued growth acceleration in ACRT's business plan. The conjecture that you have woven from an obviously weak basis of misrepresented assertations has perhaps* created one of the best bargains around. You can find a post from me on this thread on or about 11/28 to one M. Kugler. In that post I spoke of a vaccuum in the demand side of the supply/demand dynamic and that the stock was very close to experience a rather large pullback. This condition was one main factor in ACRT's decline. Then we have the "unloading" of a significant amount of stock from an institutional investor. That kind of thing happens all the time though and any good stock will recover from that. Then, along comes the shorting. Well that happens all the time too. NOW the dynamics, as I see them, are very much in favor of the demand side. You can make up any little scenario you want but it won't affect the reality of the market. The market says you're conclusions are off base. * Perhaps, as in, maybe you're, to some degree, responsible for some of the price decline. Maybe not. Doug R PS; you'll also find a post from me to the thread in general on or about 2/13/97 with a warning that the stock was in for a big drop. Believe me, I am well aware of what this co. does and what the price of the stock is doing. Now, it's going up.