Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Naxos Resources (NAXOF) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Hans Smedema who wrote (10236)	3/16/1998 8:39:00 AM
From: Jerry in Omaha	Respond to of 20681

Mr. Smedema; Welcome back, sir! You've arrived in the nick of time. <G> Mr. Smedema's first posting was on January 13, 1997, when he came out swinging at the favorite thread bad guy of the time; the illustrious David Cohen. Thank you for your contribution. Jerard P P.S. Is there anyone else in our inactive reserves that wants to wade back in? Well, c'mon in the water's fine!

To: Hans Smedema who wrote (10236)	3/16/1998 10:02:00 AM
From: SER	Respond to of 20681

Thanks Hans, Great job on sorting out the assay procedures. SER

To: Hans Smedema who wrote (10236)	3/16/1998 10:42:00 AM
From: mark silvers	Read Replies (4) \| Respond to of 20681

Hans <<2 we have the new lead fire assay from the last PR giving nice grades for 'normal'mining and which resembles or in fact is the first stage JL method, modified to be standard lead fire assay. This ore is NOT processed by Johnson at all, he just gave the secret of how to get a low cost simple standard fire assay method to the lab's. First stage!>> Hans, are you implying that these numbers we just recieved didnt go through the Johnson Process? If so, that puts the free gold concept back at center stage(at least sharing the stage)and adds a very conventional aspect to what we are doing. Verrrry interesting! I hope you're right Mark

To: Hans Smedema who wrote (10236)	3/16/1998 3:33:00 PM
From: Bear Dolbair	Read Replies (5) \| Respond to of 20681

There is no chain of custody. How can you have chain of custody when Naxos is using unproven methodology? I do not see any reputable firm staking their reputation on the effectiveness of the Johnson process or non standard fire assay? Naxos could have asked Behre Dolbear to do an independent audit on Franklin Lakes using industry accepted labs and assaying techniques. Behre Dolbear was asked to do this on the Delgratia property so why doesn't Naxos do the same? But of course this would expose Naxos lies and they don't want to do that!