Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Naxos Resources (NAXOF) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Bear Dolbair who wrote (10286)	3/16/1998 3:39:00 PM
From: mark silvers	Respond to of 20681

Bear, I think you are confused: << There is no chain of custody. How can you have chain of custody when Naxos is using unproven methodology?>> The question of COC on the ore is one thing, the methodology of the process is another. You have combined the two into some sort of statement that is nonsensical. However, as Henry seems to think that you are HL(and I agree) then we all know that you are familiar with the concept of the "do-over". Gerald, I hereby grant you (yet) another do-over. Take your time, get it right, give it your best shot. Mark

To: Bear Dolbair who wrote (10286)	3/16/1998 3:42:00 PM
From: Stoopid	Respond to of 20681

3 5/8 x 4 3:40 EST (SQS)

To: Bear Dolbair who wrote (10286)	3/16/1998 3:44:00 PM
From: SER	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 20681

Bear, Please send me Behre Dolbear phone number so I can call them for you and get the "bear" truth. Is there something you might want me to ask them? Can you handle it? SER

To: Bear Dolbair who wrote (10286)	3/16/1998 3:57:00 PM
From: Bear Dolbair	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 20681

What does the Behre Dolbear chain of custody prove? That the samples were untampered with until the testing procedures were performed? So what? Since the testing procedures (either Johnson process or modified fire assay) are not accepted in the mining industry and Behre Dolbear had no opinion on the effectiveness and reliability of the procedures, nothing was proven by the chain of custody even if it was legitimate.

To: Bear Dolbair who wrote (10286)	3/16/1998 4:11:00 PM
From: Henry Volquardsen	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 20681

How can you have chain of custody when Naxos is using unproven methodology? Your months of exile on Yahoo have dulled you edge HL. Chain of custody has nothing to do with the methodology. All Behre Dolbear did was drill the samples and secure them until turned over under chain of custody to CMRI. All the labs involved have maintained the chain of custody as clearly stated in Kim's post this morning. Naxos could have asked Behre Dolbear to do an independant(sic) audit on Franklin Lakes using industry accepted labs and assaying techniques. They are using industry standard assaying techniques. That was very clear from the last report. What is not clear was what processing was done to the material prior to assay. ALL material is processed before assay. And the processing was done by CRMI who had the material under chain of custody so there could be no question of salting. If your reference to an audit is a reference to an independent mine feasibility report that remains to be done and I am sure will be done by an independent engineering firm at some point in the future after more numbers have been collected from the 200 hole program. Perhaps Behre Dolbear will get the contract. But then you know all of this don't you. That is not the purpose of the 'March 13 1998 Brigades' recently launched posting blitz. You know Gerald a bit of advise, the next time you try to set up multiple identities don't do it all the same day. It looks real fishy when all your new personas have the same start date. Space it out a bit more. Try to plan these things better. Your friend and admirer Henry FBDR