SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Did Slick Boink Monica? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Janice Shell who wrote (10811)3/16/1998 11:21:00 AM
From: alan w  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 20981
 
Since the JF testimony is out, what is your opinion of Clinton's credibility. You keep questioning the women's credibility. Clinton, in the 92 campaign vehemently denied JF's claims. Now, it seems, he admits to one time. Which version, as you keep saying, do we believe? He is a proven liar. Fool me once..........

alan w



To: Janice Shell who wrote (10811)3/16/1998 11:26:00 AM
From: Zoltan!  Respond to of 20981
 
>>Like practically everyone else in this case, Willey has offered several different versions of her story.

There has been nothing contradictory in Kathleen Willey's prior statements, with the exception that she amended her deposition to indicate that agents of the WH have sought to have her alter her story.

Other than that, the only thing that has changed about her story is that more detail has become available. The essentials of her story have remained unchanged.

>>Some have suggested that she gave the interview in order to protect herself. I'm sceptical: any lawyer will tell you that your best course of action wheninvolved in a legal matter is to speak only to the court, and to answer only those questions asked of you. Never volunteer.

Yikes! That only applies if you fear that you are guilty of a crime and/or fear the consequences of not having told the truth!

Kathleen Willey's stance indicates in every way that she has told the truth. In that regard, she was one of the few witnesses that has testified without a personal (usually criminal) lawyer in attendance, another indicator of a confident, truthful woman without any fear of her own testimony.