SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Did Slick Boink Monica? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Janice Shell who wrote (10924)3/16/1998 3:28:00 PM
From: MulhollandDrive  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 20981
 
Yeah, it was calculated alright, she had a simple story to tell, she didn't commit any crime, and we mustn't forget she's had the benefit of watching the rest of the principals' attorney's in action. She went to the Grand Jury, told her story, then went to a respected news outlet to tell the story again. Pretty straightforward, huh.



To: Janice Shell who wrote (10924)3/16/1998 4:37:00 PM
From: RJC2006  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 20981
 
<<<She does, of course, HAVE a lawyer. My guess is that his non-appearance at the grand jury testimony was calculated, just as was Marcia Lewinsky's tragic "breakdown".

BTW: has Marcia ever been recalled? She was supposed to be...>>>

<rolling eyes> Hey, if your family was about to be credited with having helped bring down a presidency you'd have a breakdown too! That's the ironic aspect of the truth. It does far more damage than a lie.


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News