Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Did Slick Boink Monica? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: RJC2006 who wrote (10989)	3/16/1998 8:02:00 PM
From: Janice Shell	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 20981

<<<Not that women have an exclusive right to perceive themselves as victims every time a man says or does something they consider to be offensive.>>> No, and they shouldn't have that right weakened because it goes against your political agenda. Again, what are you saying? And what, exactly, is my "political agenda"? I'd be interested to know, really. Wasn't aware I had any very specific one, and even if I did, I certainly haven't enlarged upon in in this forum.

To: RJC2006 who wrote (10989)	3/16/1998 8:04:00 PM
From: Janice Shell	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 20981

By today's civil trial standards "greedy Paula" lost out financially on this deal a long time ago. What amazes me is I would bet the house that you would have gladly slapped one of those "I BELIEVE YOU ANITA" bumperstickers on your car several years back... Uh-huh. Semi-literate Paula woulda made AT LEAST $2 million by now if only she'd got that promotion. And if you'd only been following for the past few weeks: I've said repeatedly that I was never a supporter of Anita Hill. Her "case" was nonsense.