Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Did Slick Boink Monica? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Gracie Mathews who wrote (11028)	3/16/1998 8:39:00 PM
From: Zoltan!	Respond to of 20981

>>I simply don't understand your reasoning at all. You are new and so you still try. That's your problem. You will learn not to, unless you enjoy the act of self-flagellation for its character-building effects.

To: Gracie Mathews who wrote (11028)	3/16/1998 8:47:00 PM
From: Janice Shell	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 20981

Does there exist a public case of sexual harassment/assualt in which you actually believed the claims of the woman? Yes. If it's documentable. I realize this can present a problem, if the harasser is at all careful; nonetheless, I think simply accepting the woman's (or man's) testimony as "victim" sets a dangerous precedent. And dragging in people who have nothing to do with the case at hand, as Jones has done, is contemptible. Do you think Bill Clinton was exercising equal rights when he groped Willey? If you haven't yet grasped my point, I am objecting to (nearly) everyone's implicit and unquestioning belief in Willey's uncorroborated story. What possible motivation could Willey possibly have to lie about this? Money. Like nearly everyone else in this story. As I've made clear from the start, no, I haven't seen the interview. Perhaps if I had I'd feel differently. But somehow I doubt it.