SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Biotech / Medical : Zonagen (zona) - good buy? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Dauntless who wrote (2782)3/17/1998 10:42:00 AM
From: Tokyo VD  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 7041
 
Dauntless,

Amen.

(But what significant news are you awaiting?)

Tokyo



To: Dauntless who wrote (2782)3/17/1998 11:01:00 AM
From: Linda Kaplan  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 7041
 
Dauntless,

It seems to me that on many threads if someone posts something negative about a stock they are called "shorts" in a perjorative way. I just wanted to point out that you don't KNOW on the basis of someone posting negatives about a stock that they have a short position. In fact, you were wrong to accuse him of having a short position, because he doesn't have one.

To call VVUS a competitor of ZONA is also a stretch. VVUS has an approved, financially successful, product in the marketplace. Zonagen isn't competing till it has a product to sell. To suggest that Cacaito is trying to harm Zonagen because of a possible long position in VVUS is, in my opinion, unreasonable. How can we have a discussion of the facts when you are attacking his motives in such a way?

Linda



To: Dauntless who wrote (2782)3/17/1998 9:22:00 PM
From: Cacaito  Read Replies (3) | Respond to of 7041
 
Dauntless, the fact that the "old article" is out in a good journal and I think is a positive for Zonagen, also another tool to evaluate the company.

I am not a blind attacker of anything zona. I am open to the possibility that it could make it. There will be opportunities with less risks to make money in zona if they get the FDA approval.

I have being a critic of some aspects of the company and their main product, but not an unreasonable one.

And I have never called the company, their employees, or the fans any name, neither insulted anyone here.

I do not consider your reply an insult. It is a little aggresive at the most. But for what is post here before is even quite ok.

Just here for the real information.

cacaito