SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Novell (NOVL) dirt cheap, good buy? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Mike Kelly who wrote (21170)3/17/1998 1:12:00 PM
From: ToySoldier  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 42771
 
Mike,

Its these skeletons in the Microsoft software that somehow remains un-advertised while companies like Novell take it on the chin. Even the industry trade press when they do these "so called" detailed technical reviews appear to down play or even ignore the Microsft weaknesses and yet have little trouble touting the weaknesses of the other competing products.

The non-technical readers who know little of the topic blindly believe that the Microsoft software is the best software out there - when rarely is that the fact.

For the technically well-read on all the products, we get the impression that the trade press does not want to bite the hand that feeds them. After all, what is Microsoft best at and puts a lot of its budget towards? Advertising! Just take a gander through any issue of PC Week, PC Magazine, Network Computing, etc. and count the amount of and size of the Microsoft ads. If I were running any of those magazines, I would also be very careful on criticizing Microsoft products to abruptly. I would do as they tend to already do, mention the Microsoft weaknesses quietly, tactfully, or just don't mention it at all.

To paraphrase a reader response on a survey regarding Novell vs Microsoft software. He said that for anyone that knows that two products (NetWare and NT) the better technology is NetWare hands down! But its clear that most companies that are deciding to follow an NT solution or migrate away from NetWare, the decisions are being made by upper management (CIOs CFOs IT Directors) that dont understand the limitations of the NT technology and are simply basing their decisions on the trade press or the IT direction DeJure. They are like Lemmings.

A related article cited the Hallmark Corp. example where its a NetWare shop, but Microsoft flies down the senior management to Redmond for a briefing. Sounds so much like the old days of IBM marketing whereby if you can't beat your competition by your superiority in technologies, then influence/pressure/FUD the senior management into selecting your products. After all, the techies know the real truth and Microsoft won't have much of a hope at that level - so bypass them.

These CIOs, CFOs, and IT Directors should be doing what they were paid to do: analyze business requirements and produce IT requirements that would address these business requirements. They should then pass these requirements down to their IT Architects/Specialists (or even an external consultant) to develop the best IT Technology strategy that addresses these IT requirements, which in turn will address the Business requirements. They must stay out of the selection of technology and leave it to the experts!

When will companies go to the basics in developing IT strategies.

1) Identify & prioritize their BUSINESS requirements.
2) Develop & prioritize IT requirements that best meet the Business Req.
2) Identify technology strategy options to meet these requirements.
3) Objectively analyze the pros (benefits), cons(risks), and costs (in particular Operating costs or TCO) for each options.
4) Select the strategy option that best meets these requirements with
the best NET benefits to the company.

Our company (I have been involved in many myself) has performed these IT strategy processes and an NT file/print or Pure NT option for that matter almost never shows up as the best option.

Lets throw out a scary thought for some people. Novell technology will not sink into oblivion! NT will never take over the world to the point that Novell software could simply be thrown out. Even Banyan, who has never had a marketshare that has ever reached double digits, is still being used by fortune 100 companies. What is the likelihood that Novell products would experience this fate. Yet I can't believe how many companies are going NT simply because they fear Novell will not be around in 5 years. Complete and utter FUD and garbage!

It has been very frustrating for me to see how some companies make these critical dicisions based on FUD and industry trends and not based on what their company truly needs.

The good news is that the trade press is starting to come out of its fear of Microsoft and is beginning to slowly pull the skeletons out of Microsoft's closet to show the world. This is thanks in big part because of the readers that are being vocal to the press and industry on how this has been supressed in the past. But we have a long way to go before the real truth on the technology delta between NT and its competitors appears more frequently.

Sorry Mike for going on a huge Soapbox Gospel, but, if nothing else it makes me feel better to vent.

ToySoldier

PS to Paul: You wanted to know what IBM software (Java/CORBA) goes against Microsoft's NT strategy of mutated Java and DCOM.

Go to the following site to get all the info you want:

software.ibm.com



To: Mike Kelly who wrote (21170)3/19/1998 6:38:00 PM
From: Mike Kelly  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 42771
 
Open Letter from Eric Schmidt

David Coursey, publisher of The Inside Report on Computing, the Internet, and Communications, recently sent an open letter to Novell Chairman/CEO Eric Schmidt asking about the future role of the NetWare brand.

In his analysis, Coursey wrote, "I think NetWare -- promoted as an operating system -- confuses people who think choosing NetWare means somehow not choosing Win95, NT, or Unix. I believe Novell should deemphasize the concept of NetWare as an OS and concentrate on NetWare as a solutions platform." And in posting Schmidt's response, Coursey added that "Eric is probably my favorite big company CEO (Bill is in a class beyond anyone), and I think we're about 90 percent in agreement. If you have stopped watching Novell, it's about time -- maybe a quarter or two early -- to reevaluate your thoughts about the company."

Here, then, Eric Schmidt's Open Letter Response:

Novell Is Relevant Again

Dear David,

As usual, you're right! I'm glad to see you giving so much attention to Novell and NetWare 5 in your recent open letter on coursey.com. I agree with what I take to be your main point: that Novell's business, moving forward, should be focused on extending its platform for network solutions, not just delivering an operating system. Let me explain.

NetWare 5 matters to 70 million Novell customers and businesses everywhere precisely because of its excellence as a platform for network solutions. You're absolutely right, David, that customers have lost interest in where Jimmy Hoffa is buried and what the kernel-level differences are between UNIX System 4 and NT 4. They care, however, about all those solution areas where Novell is the clear leader or strives to be in the future: yes, file and print, but also messaging and collaboration; Internet services; manageability through NDS and related tools like our new Z.E.N. works; and, of course, application development and deployment. (Note: The kernel level differences matter to those of us who need to deliver scalability. We just shouldn't overemphasize them.)

A Shift Toward Solutions

This shift toward a solutions architecture, along with our growing portfolio of products, is driving the transformation now taking place in Novell's business. One of my goals on joining Novell last April was to get new products and solutions to market faster, and we now see a whole new generation of customers taking advantage of our progress in this area.

Let me offer a few examples. A major retailer needs a way to automatically deliver a formatted daily sales report covering 1,000 stores into the E-mail inbox of every executive. Florida's fastest-growing county government wants to add a dozen NT SQL servers to its network without hiring a dozen new administrators to struggle with NT domains. Network managers at a health care chain uses automatic software distribution and desktop management to add an entire new hospital and 500 new PC users to their network--all from a central location with the click of a mouse. What a concept! None of these customers asked us for an operating system. But they all asked us for solutions that weren't practical or even possible with only NT or only UNIX. We tell them that if they want to use NT to run specific applications, that's fine. But to get the most out of their IT investments, they should run their networks on NetWare.

In just the past several months we've shipped GroupWise 5.2, ManageWise 2.5, BorderManager, FastCache, NDS for NT, and Z.E.N works. Combined with NetWare 5, now in its second beta on schedule to ship this summer, these products provide the network solutions platform that makes Novell matter. Both in business networks and the ISP community.

Renewed Developer Interest

Third parties, more than ever, are adding to the strength of our solutions platform. That's why we call our expanded development environment the Open Solutions Architecture. For the first time, we are delivering a consistent set of APIs and tools to enable developers to access NDS and all of our network services. This is an environment that encompasses C++, Java, and Scripting, where you are right to recognize our potential as a server-side development and deployment platform.

It's more than just current big partners like IBM, Oracle, Netscape who will help us move in this direction. We're also looking to hot new startups and niche players, and we've recently established a $50 million Internet Development fund to stimulate the development of Java and Internet applications for NetWare.

Novell Is Relevant Again

So I think we are in agreement, David, that network solutions is the large, unclaimed territory of the IT marketplace where Novell can stake its future. I do not agree with the need to hide NetWare; the brand is well known and the product successful. I also can't agree that customers equate Novell with file and print services, UNIX and NT with servers, and NT with the services where Novell has been the leader. Your own statistics on our continued, robust server sales should be evidence enough that Novell owns the world's largest server base. In fact, the numbers from recent Computer Intelligence reports show the growth in NT sales slowing, as all epidemics eventually do, with NetWare actually regaining market share.

If you mean to imply that Novell needs to accelerate our delivery of solutions other than file or print, or that we need to do more to tell customers about our solutions to their problems, you're correct. And that is exactly what we're doing. Once again, you're on target with your emphasis on network services and solutions. We will deliver this vision in 1998.

Sincerely,

Eric Schmidt