Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Naxos Resources (NAXOF) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Tom Frederick who wrote (10458)	3/18/1998 10:53:00 AM
From: Richard Mazzarella	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 20681

Tom, wake up. Stocks are for making money. Love your God, country, and neighbor, not your stocks. <<Your problem is with me>> If you really believe that, you don't have a clue, too bad.

To: Tom Frederick who wrote (10458)	3/18/1998 11:02:00 AM
From: Larry Brubaker	Read Replies (4) \| Respond to of 20681

If you guys are looking for skeptical questions regarding this latest release, I have a few. Sorry, I just got up or I would have posted them earlier. First, I see no mention of the words COC involving this release. I therefore assume this was not COC. Second, if the results as stated in Table 1 involve standard fire assay without the Johnson treatment, why did it take so long for Naxos to be able to put out these kinds of numbers? Why couldn't they have done this years ago. Third, The results in Table 2 using the Johnson process seem little better than Table 1 with no process other than SFA. Why did the Johnson process go from 3opt to fractional opt? Running out of salt? I raise these questions for the benefit of the thread, since I read that people were disappointed none of the skeptics were contributing. You're welcome in advance <VBG>