SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Novell (NOVL) dirt cheap, good buy? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Spartex who wrote (21219)3/18/1998 1:40:00 PM
From: Wallace Rivers  Respond to of 42771
 
Some are perturbed with his ample remuneration in some sort of advisory role with NOVL while the stock traveled in a southerly direction.



To: Spartex who wrote (21219)3/18/1998 1:55:00 PM
From: TTOSBT  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 42771
 
Steve, Re: " background on Young," etc.

If you don't mind while your at it. Could you comment if he had anything to do with persisting on going head on with spread sheet war with Microsoft i.e. the Wordperfect buy in the face of Wall St's dislike of the entire deal?



To: Spartex who wrote (21219)3/18/1998 2:12:00 PM
From: Paul Fiondella  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 42771
 
Why we love tutu?

Well there is the infamous 10K per week while he kept Marengi around as acting CEO. Then there are the bumbling books and quarterly channel stuffing disasters. Totally missing the Internet take-off. Letting the company go down the drain while he took the compensation and apparently backed the wrong CEO. Missing the opportunity to sell the company to IBM. Maybe his airplane and his country club attitude don't quite mesh with the image of an actively engaged BOD or maybe its just that he doesn't appear to give a damn about the stockholders or the company or anything but himself and his pocket. Or maybe I'm just mistaken. But anyone that has participated in all of the disasters that this BOD has and in a responsible position like he has had, should have the good grace to resign. I mean what does this man tell his cronies. I participated in driving this company into the ground while I took $10K a week!

So long as Young and the other BOD members will not take responsibility for their actions what can you say about the sense of responsibility the company will get out of its employees? Or do you think Timpanogas was an accident and not symptomatic of a deeper problem of personal responsibility?



To: Spartex who wrote (21219)3/18/1998 2:35:00 PM
From: Steve Fancy  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 42771
 
Quad, with all due respect, you guys are asking me to relive all the miserable words I've pounded into this thread. It's all here. The biggest problem I have is when Young canned Frankenburg, who IMO was not ideal but was making progress, and announced a CEO search. He then took the helm as CEO and COB, collected 10K a week, put Marengi in charge, gave him his phone number, and let the company totally fall apart at a very crucial point in time. Per his own admission in a story posted somewhere on this thread "the company fell asleep". I believe it's commonly accepted the CEO search didn't even start in earnest till almost 3 months later. He oversaw the channel stuffing (being an ex HP exec, he knew what he was doing IMO) and did absolutely nothing to deal with the marketing problems and the stealth mode that Novell is known for operating in. This never should have happened, is impossible to understand, and it wasted way a lot of folks cash, while the almighty Mr Young pocketed 10K a week. He seems to have been the kingpin if the "what, me worry" attitude this company maintained for so long. Way back when someone posted the companies priorities from an old handbook...shareholders were #3. Anyone else with Mr Youngs track record at the helm of Novell was canned, but for some reason Mr Youngs gross negligence is acceptable.

I further seriously question the Novonyx arrangements and these crazy construction plans. This company has shown no signs until recently of acting responsibly to shareholders, and understanding the trouble they were/are in.

Mr Young lives on, and until the BOD is shaken up will continue to run the company IMO. IMO, when push comes to shove, Dr Schmidt has no control, and we're still under the potential curse of the forces that helped put Novell where it is. As I commented above however, this may be coming to an end, which in my IMO will leave a potential powerhouse company.

Maybe someone else might care add to this.

sf