Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Did Slick Boink Monica? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: George Gilder who wrote (11427)	3/18/1998 4:08:00 PM
From: Janice Shell	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 20981

Hey! August company here! But it's more complicated than taht: She said she heard that he said/did to someone who said that she said according to him, which was corroborated by her next-door neighbor over coffee, who believes that he said, five years ago, that she offered, but then changed her mind... And so on. But...as always, cui bono?

To: George Gilder who wrote (11427)	3/18/1998 4:47:00 PM
From: Triluminary	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 20981

Hi George, Didn't know if you were kidding or not, but MPD as used here I believe refers to Multiple Personality Disorder. If something was "impertinent" as you say then why should he have had to lie under oath? No reason to break the law over something impertinent. Why can't he just stand up like a man and admit to his own actions? Most don't really care for or about Clinton's peccadillers, but perhaps due to his peccadillers he dipped into illegal territory. That is the irony of the whole thing and the real question. Did he do something illegal? Apparently, even Janet Reno thought there might be something here. She authorized Starr to conduct his Monica investigation. As to whether Clinton's peccadiller amplifier is linear... Paula has said that's a definite NOPE. ;) Legend: pecaddilers ~ peccadilloes :)

To: George Gilder who wrote (11427)	3/18/1998 4:54:00 PM
From: Zoltan!	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 20981

>>I think Clinton is a terrible President, but why on earth shouldn't he lie when he is asked impertinent questions by independent prosecutors on some prurient witchhunt? I'm glad that you acknowledge that he has lied. The Clintonistas present resist that reality at all costs. >>Whatever happened with Monica et al it is hesaidshesaid personal shenanigans that are no business of the courts. But as long as they are, he's fair game. Remember it was his crowd that wanted the courts involved and he actually signed into law some of the very statutes that are being used to hang him. That crowd has not hesitated to use that stuff against Republicans, so why should Republicans demur now? Taken together, his actions might even qualify as a Sexual Suicide. exchange2000.com Atari Democrat anyone? exchange2000.com