SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : DoubleClick Inc (DCLK) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: TraderJimmy29 who wrote (152)3/19/1998 9:29:00 AM
From: Diana  Respond to of 2902
 
<<Why does DCLK trade at $35 per share and OTB:BB stocks NETZ trade at FIFTY cents??? >>

Many folks have no respect for OTC:BB. Considering the haphazard disclosure on the OTC:BB, how could anyone be sure that revenues were actually what NETZ, or the BB guys, wants us to think they are? If NETZ is moving onward and upward, we will see them with a better listing in the future.



To: TraderJimmy29 who wrote (152)3/19/1998 9:44:00 AM
From: Lord Data  Respond to of 2902
 
There are many reasons to this, one of them was the articles that were published a few weeks ago in wired. I can't remember the exact address, but go to wired.com and search Zulu Tek. Be careful with this stock. Since they are BB, they aren't obliged to have audited numbers or to fill 10K, so you never know the truth. I'm keeping an eye open on them though, one never knows!

Not all BB stocks are scam as many people seem to think. There are some interesting opportunites like FAMH that are real companies. You just have toi be careful with people hyping stocks at these levels!

Good luck



To: TraderJimmy29 who wrote (152)3/19/1998 9:53:00 AM
From: Oeconomicus  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 2902
 
Why does DCLK trade at $35 per share and OTB:BB stocks NETZ trade at FIFTY cents???

Could it have something to do with publishing financial statements? I still haven't gotten an answer from any NETZ nut as to how many shares are outstanding, much less what the actual revenues, profits, assets or liabilities are.

BTW, Goldman wouldn't touch NETZ no matter how many press releases they pump out simply because the potential liability of even being associated with a public company that won't release financial statements is not a risk that the partners want to take.



To: TraderJimmy29 who wrote (152)3/19/1998 10:36:00 AM
From: BACRDI  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 2902
 
DLJ direct tells me DCLK not marginable, anybody else have this problem



To: TraderJimmy29 who wrote (152)3/19/1998 4:36:00 PM
From: Silicon Trader  Respond to of 2902
 
goldman is a very good firm that is for sure!!

They hold alot of weight,ecspecially their traders.

GO NRAG MBA



To: TraderJimmy29 who wrote (152)3/20/1998 2:06:00 AM
From: David L. Wasylenko  Respond to of 2902
 
aren't you the same guy pushing (not)REDI?



To: TraderJimmy29 who wrote (152)3/20/1998 9:08:00 AM
From: Weinstein  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 2902
 
To all! Beware of TraderJimmy. He is an in-credible hypster and he often posts lies and false information. You can read his other posts on SI and find him on Yahoo with his other bashing, idiotic alias "Never_Wrong."

You really need to beware of anything this guy putr forth. You have been warned!