Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Biotech / Medical : Oxford Health Plan (OXHP) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Worswick who wrote (1314)	3/19/1998 12:40:00 PM
From: Tony van Werkhooven	Respond to of 2068

Worswick- the following was posted on AOL Motley Fool Oxford thread. The key point is the reference to the financing: Subject: Line In The Sand Date: Thu, Mar 19, 1998 10:11 EST From: JRodulavic Message-id: <1998031915113701.KAA12673@ladder03.news.aol.com> I apologize to those that have sent me mail and did not receive a reply - technical difficulties resulted in the loss of all my mail. Most of the messages were regarding technical support after 2 down days. I have a Line In The Sand - the stock must not close below 16 9/32. The TCI ( trading channel indicator) has dropped the past 2 days, this was after 5 days of upward movement. The other key indicator I watch is Zig Zag. ZigZag is not as much an indicator as it is a generalization of price action wherein the significant price movements are shown while the day-to-day randomness is removed. ZigZag reduces price action to a series of straight lines connecting successive highs and lows in closing prices. For me to be assured that price movement will continue to move upward, Zig Zag must not turn downward - that's why 16 9/32 is so important. If the stock holds and move back up off of yesterdays close, the upward technicals will remain on track. I spoke to Investor Relations yesterday regarding the $350 financing deal with Texas Pacific Group. The financing approvals are moving ahead as planned. As of this post, OXHP was asking 16 7/16 up 1/8.