Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Osicom(FIBR) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: marketmover who wrote (5995)	3/19/1998 1:27:00 PM
From: Brian	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 10479

To Marketmover: Welcome to the SI thread! That's quite a first post, how do you know for sure that the test was a fraud. Have you been talking to Craig or do you work for Brook's. Brian

To: marketmover who wrote (5995)	3/19/1998 2:28:00 PM
From: David Pawlak	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 10479

>>Has Brooks confirmed that Gigamux is "approved" for deployment?<< I have sent in an e-mail from the gentlman who was responsible for the testing just to verify. I have not heard back from him yet. He may be out of town as he usually gets back with me within 2 days. >>I know for a fact that the "test" of the Gigamux at the Brooks lab was only a publicity stunt staged by Osicom. Osicom paid the Brooks-affiliated lab for use of its test equipment and, at the time of the (fraudulent) press release, Brooks had no corporate relationship with FIBR. (The NASA lab, Dynacs, told me the same story.)>> That's a pretty strong statement, and one that I believe is totally inacurate. In addition, I totally disagree based on numerous e-mail exchanges with the Brooks evaluator. Incidentally, I just called the company to ask them if they paid Brooks to test and was told absolutely not. Can you please explain how you "know for a fact" that there is no relationship when I have hard evidence to prove otherwise?