SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : AMD:News, Press Releases and Information Only! -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Tiley who wrote (5111)3/20/1998 1:00:00 PM
From: Kenith Lee  Read Replies (3) | Respond to of 6843
 
So my question for you is (as you seem to have good sources at AMD :-) - will AMD have
350MHz parts in volume before Q3?


Manish,

If I knew, I wouldn't be here asking questions. I have invested on both companies several times in the past.

The reason I said AMD might have the capability of a higher clock K6 at this time is simply. Both Intel's and AMD's processes are similar. If the electrons in AMD's transistors are running at full speed, it does not means that Intel's electrons run faster. This defies the universal laws. Why Intel were able to get better is how they execute. Intel has done a fine job. It has more resources. These resources came from years of monopoly and denying rivals to be profitable and to compete.

Whether it is CPU or bread, management has to decide what mix (products) to be ship to maximum revenue and market share. Suppose that AMD can produce enough 400mhz K6 to equals the total revenue of 233s. For simplicity, let's say the price of 400 is 3x the 233. Based on last quarter's shipment of 1.5M units, this means AMD could only ship 500k units to customers. Since AMD is trying to keep Socket 7 alive, shipping such small units would put the lid on s7.

Until the process is mature, if you push for higher speed, yield drops significantly. Intel's 0.25u is not mature yet. So Paul's 95% yield is a real joke.

-KL