Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks : IMES -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Thos who wrote (1505)	3/21/1998 10:46:00 AM
From: Luton	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 1901

Your conduct is disgraceful !!! First, before the inquisition starts, let me assure you that I have been a small shareholder in IMES since 1992 and am not an insider, company employee, etc. I have been using this thread as an information source for a long period of time now and am used to the usual bickering and bitching. However, Tom & others, your conduct is out of bounds and does not help further your cause. Quite frankly, I'm now embarrassed that I have directed other folks to you. How do you expect people to send money to your efforts when you act in such an unprofessional manner? It certainly doesn't give me confidence to write a check c/o an individual who makes fun of handle names - is that the best we can do? Why alienate potential allies with derogatory comments, accusations, and child-like name calling? Don't get me wrong - I respect all your hard work and what you are trying to achieve and fully believe in the freedom of speech. However, your approach and responses do not invoke confidence or comfort. I was taught to always take a negative and turn it into a positive. When greeted with adversity, use it as an opportunity to present your case and win an additional supporter. Don't immediately turn them away and ridicule them. I'm sure others, like me, have been completely turned off due to the manner in which Tralornik has been treated on this thread. If you have any suspicions about people on this thread, I suggest that you send them a private message and do a little DD before slamming them publicly. I believe in full disclosure (unlike what we get from the company.) Be cognizant, however, that the company probably uses this thread as an info source also. Be careful what you post in regards to the efforts at hand and the extent of people's involvement. I know that it is human nature to want all the details, but, my friends, is it wise to have them posted here for all the world to see? Respectfully Yours, LT

To: Thos who wrote (1505)	3/21/1998 11:19:00 AM
From: Thos	Respond to of 1901

Committee (continued) page 2.... Any obscurity in my observations is intentional, but as time passes - what's left - I think a lot of things will not only become clear, but that you will observe your public company remain public, and begin to occupy the sterling position that George Smith and his team of outstanding engineers have worked so hard and long for. That's what we're all working together for now. Don't for a second think that the battle is over - yet. So anyone with a will to help here is certainly welcome. A suggestions on how? There are a lot of investigative reporters out there who make their livings uncovering stories far less focused than this one. Whether you're in the West, in Texas, or any other part of this great land, and you know or have connections on a paper that has some weight, call them up - tell them that you have a barn burner of a story they should look into. Write a letter to the S.E.C. and the NASD office nearest to you. CALL THEM, even better. But frankly the most effective assistance we could use is sufficient funds to cover more legal representation. That ultimately is the only effective voice we can muster in the Court. If we win - IF - then all funds will be repaid. Any suggestions in this important area would be gratefully received. Those of you who have already done so, we're very grateful.