Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Apple Inc. -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: J R KARY who wrote (9844)	3/21/1998 6:00:00 PM
From: Phillip C. Lee	Respond to of 213173

Jim, I surely could bear with all the conditions stated in the proxy as long as he continues his position as an interim CEO or becomes the CEO. I would rather have a clever and aggressive CEO like him than the other way around. The compensation for him or other BOD is needed for them to continue their excellent work for Apple as well as its investors. At present, I prefer Jobs to make more commitments to accept the permanent CEO except he has more convincing reasons not to do it. The 17m shares are the significant percentage out of total outstanding volume. But if they could continue keep the stock up and make Apple more healthier by increasing revenue/net income, I would give them more options based on the growth of revenue and net. Have you seen something that we don't see but insiders? Why BOD offered Jobs with such a generous package to have him drop "interim" from the current title? Well, because Q2 is too good to be true and is going to be totally a shock to analysts - just my feeling. Phil

To: J R KARY who wrote (9844)	3/22/1998 11:43:00 AM
From: RX4PROFIT	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 213173

Jim...In a previous post you mentioned a connection between Jim Cannavino and Mike Milken. I'm very much interested in this connection, can you expound. I've always felt, with no actual facts to substantiate, that somewhere in the shadows Milken may be rendering advise vis-a-vis Ellison to Jobs. Also, the proxy has an inordinate amount of clarification 'in the event of a merger/buy out' which has not been discussed/speculated as to it's intent. I've read previous company proxies and have never notice. Your thoughts? Sincerely, Dennis