To: Scott D. Hakala who wrote (764 ) 3/23/1998 6:37:00 PM From: Dr. Seuss Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 900
<<<Any conclusion that ERGB is not profitable is simply not true. >>> Unless you believe the street.... <<<In order for a significant downward departure, I would have to see the Company begin to lose momentum in sales and/or gross margins in the next year or two.>>> In fact, the downward departure from $15 to $3 is not a significant downward departure. Hang on to your stock for a couple of years to see if you actually get hit with a downward departure. Up till now, you've only lost a bit of your investment. <<<I would expect to see operating expenses come down over the next year as a percentage of sales. >>> You also expected the price to climb from $15 to $30. Well, you were close. Only off by a factor of 10. <<<I discount very heavily the lawsuit involving Neutral having any long-term effect on ERGB.>>> Except you're the same one that said that this would go away right away because they have no claim. After talking to folks, I know for a fact that they have a claim and ERGB will be worthless once the case is settled. That is why all your shareholders are selling ERGB stock, right? I mean, why would anyone sell stock for $3 when the <<<BodyBilt portion of the business at in excess of a minimum of $8.00 per share. >>> So let's see, either the entire world is wrong, or the folks being compensated by ERGB to hype their stock on the internet are wrong. Hmm? This is a toughy! It's amazing. I don't have a position in this stock, but I am so disgusted by hypsters, I find the need to spend my time letting people know this company and those that support it on the internet are a scam. Hey Ernie, you have time for lunch? dr.seuss.com