Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : ACLY- ACCELR8. Year 2000 Stock -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Jeffrey S. Mitchell who wrote (1265)	3/23/1998 7:18:00 PM
From: The Ox	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1518

It is unfortunate that CR continues this tactic. Can't see the forest because he's too busy looking at a single leaf. I wonder how many other shorts were covering today?

To: Jeffrey S. Mitchell who wrote (1265)	3/23/1998 8:17:00 PM
From: P. Ramamoorthy	Respond to of 1518

Jeff - A lot of good work. But... The stock is weak now, regardless of the fundamental analysis. Waiting for lower prices and momentum to add more shares. Ram

To: Jeffrey S. Mitchell who wrote (1265)	3/23/1998 8:56:00 PM
From: CalculatedRisk	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1518

Jeff, let me see if I understand ... you are saying that you meant 5% of the FORTRAN code is date dependent, NOT 5% of the programs, like you wrote? Obviously 5% of the programs fits my view of the FORTRAN world (actually less, but why quibble). But 5% of the code does NOT make any sense! Have you ever seen a program where 5% of the lines were date dependent - especially in FORTRAN? That is way too high. I'm trying to understand what you meant ... Regards, Bill