To: Mike Sawyer who wrote (1407 ) 3/23/1998 9:48:00 PM From: Larry Respond to of 5847
Mike, Good work with the report from your talk with Scott. To pick up a little where Brad left off: The whole rights conversion thing was very confusing and took us a long time to understand. To make a long story short it breaks down like this: 1,700,000 = Old Float Number 1,400,000 = New shares from the rights conversion __________ 3,100,000 = New Float Number The downside of the rights exercise process was of course, that it increased our float size and overall shares outstanding. The upside was that the company got a capital infusion of $244,898.25 in proceeds from the Rights. The important thing about the new shares from the rights conversion is that they were issued both in certificate form and rule 144 restricted stock form to BANY insiders and supporters who are highly unlikely to sell them anytime soon, especially not at these prices. As to your question about "whether this new issue of stock may have been shorted against as this could be where the market makers are planning to get coverage for their short." Scott is right here, because, as these shares are certed and restricted, they are simply not available for borrowing and shorting. The shares being used for shorting are the free trading ones we are trying to buy up, convert to certificates, and, as Russell says GET OFF THE STREET! The manipulations we are seeing with some of our MM's not filling orders right away, not raising the bid/ask when there is no stock available to sell, and generally misbehaving, are really just the mechanics of intentionally keeping the price depressed. That way when the time comes to cover the short, the price will be in the right place.