SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Apple Inc. -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Russ who wrote (9929)3/23/1998 10:37:00 PM
From: Bill Jackson  Respond to of 213173
 
Russ, MSFT maintains that they need that as all machines will after all run WIn ?? and if they do not use a legal copy they will use an illegal one. Of course with viable other options they would be unable to use that tack, and would not be able to defend the price jump.

In screwdriver shops only 20-30% of WIntels are sold with a bought OS, the rest the client takes with him and ossifies later (hey that is good!!, all WIntels machines are ossified)or walks in with an OS to put on.

Now the OS is as much as 10% of the system box cost in most low end machines. 10 years ago it was around 1% as the machines cost $5000 and dos was $50 or less. So MSFT is innfact caught in monopoly practices as the OS is the only thing that has increased in price over the years.

Bill



To: Russ who wrote (9929)3/24/1998 11:20:00 AM
From: HerbVic  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 213173
 
>>The consent decree outlawed that.
<<

Hadn't heard that. Good news if true. So now its the fear factor that keeps the manufacturers in line.

Microsoft could argue that they have no way to account for the number of times that their OS is installed, whereas accounting for number of boxes produced is easy. They still have a steel grip on manufacturers of Intel systems somehow.

Good hunting,
HerbVic