SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Osicom(FIBR) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: marketmover who wrote (6178)3/24/1998 6:31:00 PM
From: Brian  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 10479
 
<<I have put over $1 million where my mouth is . . . and my mouth is saying:...>>
What do you mean?
Are you saying you shorted FIBR for $1 million?
If so, I am very curious of the price, did you get it all at $6.00?

Brian



To: marketmover who wrote (6178)3/24/1998 7:09:00 PM
From: David Pawlak  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 10479
 
<<Instead, you found other people who you claim were involved with the testing who didnt explicitly contradict FIBR management and you ask "why would FIBR make a false statement>>

MarketMover-
I gave the guy that you supplied me with a very fair shake, but it became very apparent after talking with him a few minutes that he was not involved to any significant degree with the evaluation. Sure he may be the head of the lab, but he is not the one with his hands wrapped around the GigaMux evaluation. (I believe he is the one that said "here's NASA's problem, go find a solution") It was actually the gentleman that you told me to call that suggested I talk with this other individual. This person is evaluating several alternatives (DWDM and non DWDM products) for NASA, with the GigaMux being one of them. He knew the key players/developers at Osicom involved with the GigaMux by first name and has spoken with them numerous times to share data results and make suggestions. So, I really don't know what you're point is?? Did you want me to confirm what you said by someone who wasn't really clued in to what was actually happening or what?



To: marketmover who wrote (6178)3/24/1998 7:29:00 PM
From: Eddy Blinker  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 10479
 
<" I know for a fact that the "test" of the Gigamux at Brooks lab

was ony a publicity stunt staged by OSICOM..>>>>

Marketmover you did me a fine favour by completing above post with the post below. In black and white your sincere feelings about OSICOM. How well this crown of slander fits your head! What a feast! The jury loves you all ready.

< The question is why are you giving FIBR management the benefit of any doubt. Given their abysmal track record, which includes shareholder fraud charges, restated financials, stock manipulation charges, huge earnings disappointments, massive insider selling, etc., no one on Wall Street will ever give these guys another chance -- ever.>>>>

Have you ever considered what the employees would do to you and
Craig if they meet you on the court house steps?

What is the matter with your guys? First the big man announces that he has no investigation abilities but nevertheless knows it all. And now you, the shoe in commits another blunder.

Since you put $ 1 000 000 where your mouth is I propose to you to consider my bet.The result would clear up what is real and what is not, real quick.

Please go to skymidi.com and look it over.

ED