SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Non-Tech : Any info about Iomega (IOM)? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: sheila rothstein who wrote (51123)3/25/1998 9:37:00 AM
From: RoadWarrior  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 58324
 
Not too bad this morning.. low at 7 1/16, now at 7 3/16. Hold on!!

-RW



To: sheila rothstein who wrote (51123)3/25/1998 9:47:00 AM
From: Michael Coley  Respond to of 58324
 
RE: Rocky's Point of View.

Sheila,

>> I like to hear Rocky's point of view, it provides the contrarian analysis for me. <<

I find Rocky's point of view humorous, but I find Ken P.'s point of view to be a much better bearish argument.

- Michael Coley
- wwol.com



To: sheila rothstein who wrote (51123)3/25/1998 10:02:00 AM
From: Cogito  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 58324
 
>>I like to hear Rocky's point of view, it provides the contrarian analysis for me.<<

Sheila -

Contrarian, yes. I wouldn't call it analysis.

I second Michael's view. I'd rather hear from Ken Pomeranski.

BTW, it's ten o'clock, and my stop at 7 1/16 hasn't filled. I placed it just after the stock hit that low point. I just wanted to protect myself.

We'll see what happens as the day progresses.

- Allen


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News