Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : Nostradamus: Predictions -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: puddinhead who wrote (283)	3/25/1998 1:53:00 PM
From: Arris	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1615

I have never seen a bigger collection of nuts since I left Brazil! The entertainment value of this thread is without parallel, I didn't know that Internet use was considered therapy. What a hoot!

To: puddinhead who wrote (283)	3/25/1998 2:16:00 PM
From: Dwight Taylor	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1615

Who is it then?

To: puddinhead who wrote (283)	3/25/1998 5:10:00 PM
From: Father Terrence	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1615

A brilliant theory. Using your method I deduce the Antichrist is . . . PUDDINHEAD!! Well, whaddya know? Father Terrence

To: puddinhead who wrote (283)	3/25/1998 5:38:00 PM
From: Fridrik Skulason	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 1615

Re: Nostradomas might of had some insight or vision of the future but to compare him with the God inspired Holy men who wrote the Bible is a bad comparison. Only if you beforehand belive that they were "God inspired Holy men", and thus must be absolutely correct. Otherwise it is a perfectly valid comparison. Personally I don't consider the bible any more accurate that Nostradamus' predictions, but that is besides the point. Now, I have read several books with interpretations of the predictions of Nostradamus over the years, and it is remarkable how frequently the interpretations change - seemingly in order to "fit" recent events. There is a handful of his predictions that even "hard" sceptics will admit came true, but so what - Jeannie Dixon, Edgar Cayce and even Gordon Scallion got a "hit" every now and then ... which of course is easy if you just make enough predictions. The vast majority of Nostradamus' predictions can be interpreted in numerous different ways to fit a large number of events through the past few centuries, but human gullibility being what it is, there will always be a market for the latest, greatest book with an interpretation of his predictions. It never ceases to amaze me that some people actually take all this crap seriously.