SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Gold/Mining/Energy : International Precious Metals (IPMCF) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Ron Struthers who wrote (31227)3/25/1998 6:41:00 PM
From: Zeev Hed  Read Replies (3) | Respond to of 35569
 
Ron, how are you? Since you are already visiting here, maybe you could clarify some simple questions?

What is the burn rate now at IPM (it used to to run in the $4 MM/year and higher).

How many months do they have at this burn rate?

What kind of funding can they expect?

What kind of dilution will that cause?

Then it would be nice to find out where are they in cost effective extraction.

Hope you have some answers.

Zeev



To: Ron Struthers who wrote (31227)3/25/1998 10:19:00 PM
From: Steve Huskey  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 35569
 
<<I believe this negative
outcome is already in the market price and is expected.>>

I disagree with this. Almost every stock that I held that became delisted ( ie moved down to the bulletin board) lost about 50% of it's value in 2weeks - 2 months.

The market makers really seem to take it to the cleaners when this happens.

Hope not... but that has been my experience.

Steve



To: Ron Struthers who wrote (31227)3/26/1998 12:31:00 AM
From: knight  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 35569
 
Ron:

>>>The property deal is a good one. It removes one issue with
the company. It is far cheaper for IPM than before and this
reflects the reality of the mining market, which is basically
a graveyard with a long waiting list and a few stirring bodies
inside.<<<

The devaluation of Black Rock has nothing to do with the reality of the mining market. BRX was vastly overvalued based on the poor assay results and lack of an economic extraction method. These problems still face IPM. Comparing this play to conventional miners is not a fair comparison. I don't see how the proving of a low grade deposit with no extraction method will turn heads. Just MHO.



To: Ron Struthers who wrote (31227)3/26/1998 3:23:00 PM
From: Che  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 35569
 

<<<< The case against them is poor. >>>> Ron, what is the basis for the case against them?