Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Did Slick Boink Monica? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Janice Shell who wrote (12257)	3/26/1998 3:33:00 PM
From: MulhollandDrive	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 20981

Exactly my point about Mc Veigh. I can't recall the title, but the fact that he had a certain book in his possession dealing with anarchy and government repression was certainly considered relevant to his charges. We didn't hear this hue and cry about "invading" the inner sanctum of his mind, did we? I may be mistaken, but the book may have even been entered into evidence. The writer of your "relevant" article has absolutely no way of knowing what Starr is looking for, who was the source? Like I said before, Lewinksy may have even mentioned the book(s) by title on the tape and could most certainly be used as corroborating evidence to support the argument that she spoke truthfully on the tapes and is lying on her affidavit.