Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks : Zulu-tek, Inc. (ZULU) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Gary Floerchinger who wrote (4903)	3/27/1998 2:12:00 AM
From: PartyTime	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 18444

I don't have a lot of time now to sift through continued negative heapings. But I know, for now, they won't go away. In my view, a lot of this is designed to harass: Maybe some friend supporting some other friend who has a beef. Nothin' you can do about that. I also know you can't have anything bad to say unless you have something bad to say. So there's some stuff there, and it ain't particularly great stuff. But there's something. Most of us see through exaggeration, however. It's not quite like the quality of opinion, but we tolerate it. So how bad is the bad? It could be not bad at all. Why? Because we've only heard one side of the story. How do we get Hayton's interpretation of events? I don't know. Do you? Is the alternative believing only one side of the argument? I don't think so. Patience for reason is a worthy venture. My opinion is still open on Hayton. Is yours? In today's world, it's easy to paint the bad, even on good things. Computer technology is a good example. It's where the pictures sometimes aren't what they really seem. Hayton's been painted badly. No doubt about it. But all among us carry baggage of some kind. Try to backdrop what you know about Hayton against what you know about your own baggage. Have you ever been misunderstood? I have. But also, when you consider your own baggage, at least you get to consider both sides of the story. We don't have that with Hayton's version yet. So you've got to go with what you've got. There's technology, there's a climate for the technology; there's proven leadership at the helm and there's direction and goals, even companies to move against as competitors (hello Doubleclick). There's clientele of magnificent magnitude (no need to name-drop, you've heard 'em) and, importantly, there's a secure alliance with ESVS for a Nasdaq listing in the mill. These last two paragraphs, with a sense of caution for the other stuff, tells us NETZ is a good betting penny stock. I'm still glad I had the guts to get in! I'm staying long until I have a reason to think differently.