Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Arconenergy, Inc. (Long Term Investors and Fundamentals) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Ga Bard who wrote (455)	3/29/1998 10:31:00 AM
From: John H	Read Replies (7) \| Respond to of 1757

To Ga Bard and all who participate in these discussions: This is my first comment on SI. I have been reading this thread since it started. With Jeff Rainey I have seen an amazing amount of hype at QDRX and now have a few questions about ARCON. I read the first 50 or so entries Ga Bard made when he started this thread. Ga Bard, you spoke at one point about the openness of this new management and their willingness to get involved with the thread. I do not see this happening at all -- apart from responses occasionally reported by Jeff to the thread from the IR guy. The financing of the leasehold interests in the fields has also never been discussed. Who is behind these transactions? How do you all know that anything is really happening? Have the plants you described in earlier posts even begun to be assembled or put in place? To me, the silence has been somewhat deafening from the company. I am also concerned that the amazing introductory reports and discussions have recently deterioratied into back and forth "do be do be do" messages that no longer contain much real information or analysis. Several of the writers to the thread talk about the company defining itself. What do you all really mean by this? Many people, including myself, doubtlessly have bought into this stock based on Ga Bard's many missives setting forth the company's bright purposes, missions and approaches. Does defining itself simply mean getting going or is there something more basic missing here? I thought it had already been defined in the broad sense, as set forth in your DD? Ga Bard, would you please explain this constant talk about definition. Also going undiscussed, I feel, is the constant pushing back of promised shareholder meetings and company decisions? Is this a matter of concern for anyone else? Finally, with respect I want to say that what promised to be an information thread is becoming something of a glad hander while already in investors hum back and forth about things they do not appear to really know or just express their hopes. I urge that you all recommit this thread to passing on knowledge not just the sound's of hopeful music. As I do not have such knowledge myself I will only appear occasionally to ask questions or to congratulate you all in the hopefully likely event that you are right about this stock. Thanks John H