Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Did Slick Boink Monica? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: jlallen who wrote (12513)	3/30/1998 3:11:00 PM
From: Grainne	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 20981

jlallen, I did not indict lawyers in general!! And I have made it clear that I did not. Obviously, if you know everything about how the legal system operates, and you have no integrity besides, it is easier to avoid the consequences of your behavior. That does not mean all attorneys would do that. The Clinton motto is obfuscate first, and hope the problem goes away. I do not think they are quite as clever as they think they are, however. It was pretty amusing that they rushed Kathleen Willey's letters to the White House to the press the day after the 60 Minutes interview (James Carville's motto: speed kills!), totally forgetting they claimed to not possess any in the Jones proceedings, when they were subpoeanaed. Ha ha!! Obstruction of justice!! And then to weakly and falsely assert afterwards that those under the control of Clinton, as opposed to the control of the White House, fall into a separate category when the subpoena clearly asked for ALL documents in either category, is ludicrous. I guess they are slipping or something.! It gets harder and harder to keep your story straight, the more things you lie about.