Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : ECHARTERS -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Eashoa' M'sheekha who wrote (2493)	4/1/1998 10:30:00 AM
From: Bill Jackson	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 3744

Eric, Samples are delivered from a truck thousanda of miles from BRE-X. Were they asked to assay them for gold content or comment about BRE-X? Were the samples unusual?. Do not forget this was a carefully crafted fraud and DeGuzmna would have included only fine gold that would pass a cursory inspection. Are you saying that all assay labs now have to criticise the material and tell the world. What if they did tell BRE-X, most labs I use would tell me fisrt about any irregularities and DeGuz may have fobbed them off with an explanation. Did they comment to BRE-X?. They have no route to the public. Like your doctor if he found you had a loathesome diseae, would he tell the press?, or tell you and trust you to do the right thing. If that doctor told the press you could sue and he would lose clients too. Same with an assay lab. You cannot lay 1% blame on them just so the lawyers can make them pay. Bill