Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : ECHARTERS -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Bill Jackson who wrote (2494)	4/1/1998 7:10:00 PM
From: E. Charters	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 3744

If you have knowledge of a crime, you should report that crime to the persons who may do something about it. If you have knowledge and that knowledge may be proven or a judge may assume knowledge (Short sales accounts etc..) then yes it IS a crime and it MAY be punished. I think you know that. Many have been hung to death for knowledge assumed. First to cover your ass you report the salting to management. They may not know. Then to cover it further you alert the exchange to the possibility. Second you tell management that you cannot do may more work until the matter is put to rest. Because if it is ever found out, and you could have known it but failed to tell anyone, then your professional reputaion is ruined as an incompetent and you honesty ever after suspected. I don't think anyone should be in a rush to use Kilborn or Normet after this embarrassment. EC<:-}

To: Bill Jackson who wrote (2494)	4/2/1998 1:05:00 AM
From: brian krause	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 3744

Bill, if a doctor had proof of my disease and the public had a interest in my health I doubt would need to be disclosed. ( other than in the interest of public health it would probably be required for a disclosure to be made naming the disease....being highly contagious.... but naming the disease and it's hazards, not necessarily the name of the infected) If a lawyer knew of it nothing would be required. If an engineering firm had knowledge of it I think they would be required to disclose the fact.