Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : BAY Ntwks (under House) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Beachbumm who wrote (5034)	4/1/1998 10:35:00 AM
From: Bosco	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 6980

Dear Beachbumm - yes, you are right that SV carries some weight, but my experience with its [-ve] recommendations dated back when it tried to roll PAIR over. If non short term investors listen to them, they do that at their own peril. rgds Bosco

To: Beachbumm who wrote (5034)	4/1/1998 4:49:00 PM
From: Wizard Wannabe	Respond to of 6980

Well...I performed another fundamental analysis over at eduvest.com based on SoundView's revised eps projections: 1998 eps .77 1999 proj. eps 1.25 Result: $36.63/per shr., P/E 35.23, Relative Risk .83 (very reasonable). Still fundamentally undervalued. I posted the above result in the VPA's Forum post room. Click on the site's "Forum" icon, click "Alphabetical" listing and scroll down to the Bay posts. My post is dated 04/01/98. BTW: You can click on the result to analyze my input parameters and you can even make changes to get different results. Wiz