Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Dell Technologies Inc. -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Chuzzlewit who wrote (36364)	4/2/1998 1:52:00 PM
From: Lazlo Pierce	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 176387

Hey guys you made it onto the street.com! ******************* Top Stories: Dell 'Sell' Rating Has Analyst Bombarded with Investor Hate-Email By Eric Moskowitz Staff Reporter 4/2/98 1:50 PM ET Craig Kaufman has committed broker blasphemy. A week ago he initiated coverage of the highflying box maker Dell (DELL:Nasdaq) with a sell rating. His life hasn't been the same since. Kaufman has been taunted on Internet message boards, spammed with nasty emails and bombarded with angry phone calls. "I've been getting hundreds of emails from Dell fans saying you're pathetic and that they were going to send my reports to the SEC. It's been pretty unbelievable," says Kaufman, who founded the New York-based tech research boutique Kaufman Bros. just over three years ago. "I've gotten so many calls that I've had to have my calls forwarded for the last four days." That an analyst risks rebuke by going negative on a company is nothing new to Wall Street. Sell-side analysts who traffic in the terms neutral, hold or sell can hurt their own relationship with a company as well as their firm's investment banking prospects But in the online age, there's a whole new contingent to contend with -- angry investors who now have an outlet to vent. "Your analysis of DELL is lazy at best ... I doubt that you had any objectivity in evaluating the merits of this company... Mr. Kaufman, you do a tremendous disservice to your clients ... [Kaufman and his company] are complete idiots," said one Silicon Investor poster who goes by the moniker LongonDell. Another poster, code-named Venkie, had this to say about Kaufman's report, titled "The Emperor Has No Clothes in PC Land": "Is this a common ignorance or lack of due diligence or is it sour grapes from missing out on a fabulous story? ... The Kaufman boys have no clothes." Said another poster, Freeus: "Maybe this is Kaufman's way of getting noticed???" Not many analysts are likely to have enjoyed such a reception. Only 1% of all analysts have a strong sell, or 5, rating on a stock, and 2% have a sell, or 4, rating, according to Chuck Hill, director of research at First Call. "That means that 97% of all analyst ratings are either a neutral or better," says Hill, "but everyone knows that analysts have a pronounced optimistic bias." Hill says the average analyst rating for First Call's 6,000-plus stock universe just jumped from 2.2 to 2.0, equivalent to a buy rating. For Dell, it's 2.0. While other analysts have holds on the company -- 12 of the 29 tracked -- Kaufman is the only known analyst with a sell, Hill notes. Typically, a hot stock like Dell (it's up more than 300% over the last 52 weeks) creates a dilemma for analysts. Oftentimes when you have a stock with a cult following, it seems like the only safe time to downgrade is after the bad news comes out. And that's when analysts are called out for being too late on a stock, says Hill. "Unfortunately, more often than not, the herd mentality takes over and analysts react en masse -- it's the ones who stick their neck out after doing solid research and turn out to be right that should be followed." Perhaps, but when you combine a hyperventilating market with this era's instant feedback mentality, the terrain for analysts becomes treacherous. Even Kaufman seems to be second-guessing the payoff for going out on a limb. "Even though we're a pretty small outfit compared to a Hambrecht & Quist, the response from my Dell call has almost made me not want to do this again."

To: Chuzzlewit who wrote (36364)	4/2/1998 7:54:00 PM
From: K. M. Strickler	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 176387

PLL, If you traded TLAB in a tax sheltered account (IRA), how would the active trader faired? Regards, Ken

To: Chuzzlewit who wrote (36364)	4/3/1998 8:49:00 PM
From: freeus	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 176387

***both off and on topic**** Dear Paul, Analysis fascinating. (Also what fun to have been made "famous" along with Venkie and LongonDell for our comments.) NowI can see a few exceptions, which dont actually apply to me at this point anyway. l. would be if you actually wanted to live off your trading profits: would it be more profitable to buy and sell and take some money out for spending money, or just buy and hold and occasionally sell a few shares? 2. interested in the analysis (e.g. TLAB for an IRA account with active trading, as someone else asked.) except that how can one assume one would pick the "right " time to get in and out????? Ah yes, the million dollar question. 3. if you were lucky enough to sell near the high for a stock like wdc and then it never gave another buy signal, how happy you would be!!!!! Keynes: the person who gave the intellectual elite and professorial types of this country a reason to be communist in theory without calling it that. Von Mises and Freeman: guys who recognized that the reason the U.S. is what is it is today is because it is still resting on the laurels of a once free society with a once freeish market. In that market entrepreneurs could count on keeping their profit and so were motivated to explore, experiment and come up with new and better ideas. Of course it would have been nice if the gov had kept out of it then too (and not sided with railroads or employers as it later did with employees) its gotten much more restrictive against entrepreneurs and much harder to run one's own business and count on making and keeping a profit. Witness the hell the "non Just department" is even putting Bill Gates through. (And unfortunately he is still not a Libertarian, even though we are the only ones supporting him so far.) Sounds like I should have known about TLAB, sounds like a great performer. Freeus