SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Did Slick Boink Monica? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Janice Shell who wrote (12715)4/2/1998 3:14:00 PM
From: greenspirit  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 20981
 
EXECUTIVE PRIVILEDGE GIVEN TO ALL AMERICANS



To: Janice Shell who wrote (12715)4/2/1998 3:26:00 PM
From: Zoltan!  Read Replies (3) | Respond to of 20981
 
You said "Bravo" to Sam's statement:
Filegate (the one Clinton "scandal" that does disturb me--it is also ironic that the Republicans voted to keep the name of the FBI building despite the fact that Hoover was by far the worst single official offender of the violation of privacy in our history)

Why are you liberals so uninformed about history and American history in particular?

While Hoover certainly did commit some violations of privacy he also used his power to stop many of the more outrageous acts against US citizens that the Kennedys wanted to the FBI to perform. Hoover shielded Americans from the Kennedy's transgressions. No wonder liberals despise him and not McCarthy's right hand man, RFK. Funny isn't it that those transgressions have been more ably documented by British authors?

RFK will never get his name on the FBI building because the FBI files are replete with violations that he committed. Remember Hoover took care to get RFK's signature on RFK's order to spy on Martin Luther King, despite Kennedy's attempts to avoid a paper trail - liberals always seem to omit that fact. Do you wonder why a Democrat Congress passed a law that forbade another RFK situation from ever happening again?

Even if RFK hadn't committed so many outrageous acts as AG, wouldn't it just be preposterous to put the name of America's most famous organized crime family on the FBI building?

It is not only ironic but also telling that liberals would want to make that change.