SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : COMS & the Ghost of USRX w/ other STUFF -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Scrapps who wrote (14463)4/3/1998 7:44:00 AM
From: David Lawrence  Read Replies (4) | Respond to of 22053
 
By John Simons, Staff Reporter of The Wall Street Journal
WASHINGTON -- The Federal Communications Commission is working on a
plan to start levying fees on companies that provide phone services via
the Internet.
The proposal, which the commission is expected to send to Congress
next week, would require Internet-service providers to pay access
charges to local telephone companies for services they provide their
customers on-line. The FCC also would require those companies to pay
into the government's "universal service fund," which subsidizes
inexpensive phone service in rural and inner-city areas.
If the five-member commission approves the proposal, it would be a
major break from the Clinton administration's hands-off regulatory
policy toward the Internet. The administration has pledged to maintain a
laissez-faire stance concerning federal regulation of the Internet and
federal taxes on Internet commerce. Indeed, White House Internet czar
Ira Magaziner last July outlined a plan to allow the industry to
regulate itself.
Telephone communication over the Internet is a fairly new medium;
through it consumers can place calls from personal computer to
telephone, PC to PC, and even phone to phone anywhere in the world-all
for much cheaper than a regular call. Just like an electronic-mail
message, those voice calls travel over telephone wires, then bounce
between the Internet's maze of routers and switches, using a software
protocol known as IP, or Internet Protocol. These services aren't
regulated by the government.
Industry analysts estimate that just 1% of all voice calls take place
over the Internet now, but that figure is expected to grow rapidly over
the next few years. Already, companies such as AT&T Corp. and Qwest
Communications Inc. are planning to offer cheap IP-based phone services.
Some Internet-service providers such as IDT Corp. of Hackensack, N.J.,
have used their Internet experience to enter the international
voice-telephony market. Some larger telephone carriers have complained
that the Internet-service providers place a burden on the telephone
systems while skirting universal service fees which all phone carriers
must pay.
Some lawmakers, particularly those from rural states, have complained
as well. Republican Sen. Ted Stevens of Alaska, prompted Congress to
have the FCC look into the matter.
The issue is part of a broader question: How should the FCC
distinguish a "telecommunications service," from an "information
service?" The distinction is important because, under current FCC rules,
telecommunications companies pay billions of dollars in universal
service fees while information companies do not. Under the proposed
plan, information companies such as Internet phone services must report
those revenues to the FCC for the purpose of paying universal service
fees.
John Nakahata, chief of staff to FCC Chairman William Kennard, said
that while the plan would be a departure from Clinton administration
policies, it could be seen as a win-win situation that supports Internet
growth while ensuring that rural and inner-city communities continue to
receive subsidized telecommunication services.
One FCC official close to the issue was more direct. "A telephone
call is a telephone call, regardless of the equipment in between," he
said.
If approved, universal service fees are likely to be passed on to
consumers in the form of higher Internet-service charges.
Copyright (c) 1998 Dow Jones & Company, Inc.
All Rights Reserved.



To: Scrapps who wrote (14463)4/3/1998 8:17:00 AM
From: jhild  Respond to of 22053
 
I'll report back later on that.



To: Scrapps who wrote (14463)4/3/1998 9:38:00 AM
From: jhild  Read Replies (3) | Respond to of 22053
 
We now have 9000



To: Scrapps who wrote (14463)4/6/1998 3:40:00 PM
From: jhild  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 22053
 
Well, Scrapps, break out that keg, and get a comfy chair in front of the TV. I'm calling a Dow 9000 close with another twenty minutes to go, and am really looking forward to the Special DOW 9000 Report.

It's 'sure to be as exciting as doing TA on the Crash of '29.

Please take notes, in case I fall asleep.