Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks : Rocky Mountain Int'l (OTC:RMIL former OTC:OVIS) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: MY OPINION who wrote (44868)	4/3/1998 12:54:00 PM
From: Mesaba	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 55532

I have yet to belittle anybody on this thread. The solution is to face reality and understand that sometimes things aren't what they seem no matter how much one hopes. Oh, and thanks for your permission to drivel on. I was starting to get the impression you didn't like me. M

To: MY OPINION who wrote (44868)	4/3/1998 1:06:00 PM
From: s martin	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 55532

Daddy, from all appearances it seems to me that RMIL is worthless. Unless there is a way to verify a large short position it seems pointless for shareholders to throw good money after bad by paying attornies or CPA's in an attempt to resume trading. If trading resumes with no evidence of a viable business who would buy ? The point IMO is for those of you who are stuck with this, to be able to sell your stock.... but to whom ? If there are in fact shorters in significant numbers they would more than likely begin covering if trading resumed. There are two question that need to be resolved IMO, is the float actually certified ? To verify that, someone would need to get Riley's list and verify it. Is there really a short position that is significant? To determine that is a bit more difficult, but for starters you could try to get Riley to give you his reasoning or his proof that one does exist.