Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Did Slick Boink Monica? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Janice Shell who wrote (12849)	4/3/1998 9:26:00 PM
From: robnhood	Respond to of 20981

I think that they had both denied it, but other then taht(ouch), see Message 3953006 cause we feel impotent? I'm not quite sure why.. russell

To: Janice Shell who wrote (12849)	4/3/1998 11:05:00 PM
From: John R Resseger	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 20981

<<<<<<But why must we KNOW about this stuff? Why should we CARE? So she went to bed with him? So WHAT?>>>>> Because she lied about it, just as Monica lied about it, and countless others. Some were bribed others and were intimidated or both. Get It! What is important, Vernon Jordan was the bag man, paying off both Monica and Web Hubbel, to keep their mouths shut. Taht is the connection to Whitewater. It is far more important, then a 3rd rate burglary, of an election headquarters, of a hopeless candidate.