Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : Electronic Contract Manufacture (ECM) Sector -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: rich evans who wrote (1421)	4/3/1998 11:08:00 PM
From: jbe	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 2542

Rich E. - Of course, you are right, at least about one thing. There are, as you say, many definitions of cashflow, as I learned when I started a (now defunct) Free Cashflow thread. I also learned that using the free cashflow definition that involves subtracting necessary capital expenditures from net income plus depreciation has a problem: working from a 10Q, you cannot tell how much of the capital expenditure listed on the cashflow statement is "necessary" and how much is "discretionary." Nor is the management statement always that helpful. So, many services (e.g., MarketGuide) just subtract ALL capital expenditures. (Morningstar, by the way, employs a different method to calculate free cashflow.) I use these numbers as a rough, but convenient, guide. If I regarded them as the last, ultimate truth, I would not have posted my questions here. Your distinction between SCI/FLEXF/etc. on the one hand, and BHE & PLXS on the other is helpful. The fact remains, however, that companies often DO overextend themselves. And I still wonder whether this may not be the case where SCI and the others are concerned. jbe