Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Biotech / Medical : Ligand (LGND) Breakout! -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: michael meyers who wrote (18614)	4/4/1998 11:43:00 PM
From: Flagrante Delictu	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 32384

Michael, OFF TOPIC, I am truly sorry that I phrased the accusation made by NAH in such a manner that you had great difficulty in understanding what I said that she said. If you will check each word closely & slowly, you may discover that she wanted me to desist from "derogatory fun making of the female human body ". I asked her to provide evidence showing where I had done such a thing. In specifically referring to that post, you have charged that I" make fun of women all the time." From reading your profile, I have noticed that you claim to have received 2 degrees from the U. of Chicago. Therefore, I don't think it is unreasonable of me to expect a certain degree of reading comprehension from you. Consequently, I am asking you to show the thread a few things to back up your accusations, First, tell us what I wrote that would warrant your accusation, "Bernie, too funny. You make fun of women all the time, and yet ask for evidence?" Second, having made the accusation that I make fun of women all the time, kindly show us that what you said is true, by referring to the specific posts in which I did so. Then you will have provided the evidence I request of you, which evidence,you know I am entitled to, as the subject of your accusations. Lastly, to prove your accusation that " Obviously, you want to see your remarks appear yet again on the LGND thread." kindly demonstrate for the edification of the threadsters how you justify that conclusion. We know a U. of Chicago man would have received a sufficient education to inform him against making reckless, unprovable accusations. He would have sufficient evidence to corroborate any accusations he would make.