Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Biotech / Medical : Ligand (LGND) Breakout! -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Jack Be Quick who wrote (18641)	4/5/1998 3:51:00 AM
From: Flagrante Delictu	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 32384

John, OFF TOPIC Long ago, I recognized your potential to provide interesting posts on this thread. Once again we have an interesting one. The most interesting thing you had to say in this post,IMO. was contained in choice "e" of the 5 "eithers" you allowed for. >> (e) you are simply wasting the Ligand thread's time, and your own considerable talent and abilities with a lot of really dreary stuff ( a dim possibility - added merely for completeness sake ).<< John, Michael Meyers accused me, falsely, in my opinion, of making fun of women all the time in my posts. I asked him to provide evidence to support his accusation. You have stated in (e) of the "eithers" that my request of Meyers to back up his accusation is possibly a waste of the Ligand thread's time. What then can we think of this post of yours? You are not claiming that I have injured you in any post. If I, who has been demonstrably victimized by a so far unsubstantiated accusation, can be deemed by you to have possibly wasted the Ligand thread's time with my post requesting my accuser to provide evidence, what leg do you have to stand on, who have not claimed to have been falsely accused of anything, to waste the Ligand thread's time with this equally dreary , but very frivolous,post of yours? If you recall, you once referred to an earlier post of yours recommending a halt in trading in LGND, as moronic. I disagreed with that assessment.I thought it was merely disappointing. So also is this post, John, I am sorry to say. Are you advocating that injured parties should quietly slink away, licking their wounds (IYWPTE) without confronting their accuser? Or do you think the uninjured have a greater right to use the LGND thread's time with frivolous posts, highlighting their quality instruction in written communication? Please keep posting. You can do better than this.