To: Pugs who wrote (44957 ) 4/5/1998 9:05:00 AM From: tonto Read Replies (3) | Respond to of 55532
Pugs, I knew you were incapable of following through with your committment to leave the board and not be disruptive. You post so many important made up things, that it must be imperative for others to read it. That is your concept and part of the cause in your investment decisions. The group has splintered, and you are a cause of it Pugs. This is not benefiting the shareholders. Garry, you expressed much class in your last post. There is no doubt your word is good. Everyone possibly involved with RMIL and RMCW are aware of the bad scenario which exists both for the companies and the trading of stock. There is nothing magical in talking to the heads of big non operating penny stocks. Gary and Roland are hiding behind Lori and the answering machine, and do not speak to the shareholders they have hurt. The logic posted is this is a good sign, these brilliant non operating penny stock wizards must be doing something for us, right now. Sorry, but they are doing nothing more than hiding out from you. There is so much at stake, all of your groups invested money has been jeopardized by these guys, yet many want to let them continue as they have, even with their record of performance and deceit. This group has the chance to do what is right, learn more about EXACTLY what is going on with their investment, receive the by-laws for review, and be good proactive investors. The other approach of waiting patiently for months, allowing management to issue lies without shareholder recourse, has proven to be harmful to your investment. It is hard to swallow what happened, and it appears that many in the group wish to ride this thing out, and that is their right. Heck, the "shorts" must love it. A plan of inaction towards getting the stock trading by the competent group of shareholders is to their advantage. Gary and Roland have shown nothing but incompetence to date, and the "huge group of illegal naked shorts" I would think would prefer that their bet on the table not be molested. If they exist, they bet against the boys hiding behind Lori and the answering machine. Inactivity may be in THEIR best interest. They would probably want you not to do anything proactive as it could jeopardize their position. Gary and Roland have proven to be a shorter's dream come true. The group may want to consider why the company was shorted in the first place. Was it because of management, non operations and a scrapped "refurbished" vessel? If that is the case, how is it in your best interests to support the reason for shorting? Could the above reason be the cause of the trading halt initiated over 3 months ago? Is it in your best interest in the eyes of the authorities to continue on as before? With the same managers? Have a great day today.