Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Alternative Fuel Systems ATF:VSE -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Ally who wrote (686)	4/5/1998 11:07:00 AM
From: The Osprey	Respond to of 4605

Hi Denise, I am interested to know why this deal with Mexico would not be insurable via the Canadian Export Trade Development Corporation? It is technolgy that has been around in developed countries for a while but in NAFTA with Mexico now a partner, would it not be an insurable contract? Regards Doug J

To: Ally who wrote (686)	4/5/1998 11:15:00 AM
From: Don B	Respond to of 4605

Denise don't you think EDC could get involved in this?? Or better yet could be they are already involved??

To: Ally who wrote (686)	4/5/1998 11:46:00 AM
From: Lonnie	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 4605

Hello all. While we are/were on the subject of trading way over book value, let's not forget Ballard. IMO it's a tech stock Bre-x waiting to happen. No one knows if they can even manufacture a fuel cell cheap enough for the average Joe/Jane to ever afford a vehicle with an FC unit. They will probably not have revenue for another 5-10 years and it's trading at 158.00! How many more pension funds are going to get hit on this one if they find out it can't be manufactured economically? ATF is at 2+. Yes it is being hyped by perSpectives, but it also has sales, affordable prices and immediate potential. If you look at the posters on these threads it usually doesn't take long to figure out who is a day trader and who is in for the long haul. It would be wise for everyone to determine, who on this thread is the perSpective monitor, and give less credence to them than you would, more credible posters that were here long before he/she arrived. JMO as I have seen far too many people on other threads such as Pyng, NetNanny, GroupWest and others that have been the ones holding that expensive paper after the share price corrected itself. So, yes ATF is trading over book value and being hyped at the moment but if everyone is careful, has that knowledge, and lives within their own comfort level then we should all have fun.

To: Ally who wrote (686)	4/5/1998 11:50:00 AM
From: Fishfinder	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 4605

Hey Denice,----GO AWAY!!!!!! You are starting to remind me of Sid Turtleman from earlier Ballard Posts. Full speed, spinning off yards of asumptive balony. Personally I weigh 95% of my beliefs in what a company states in their press releases. I certainly don't listen to the likes of you. Why don't you take up spinning wool instead of spinning yarns, and let the people at ATF decide whether they are going to get paid for their product or not. And yes it is a free world and this is what I think. BUY Scott