Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : TAVA Technologies (TAVA-NASDAQ) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: CalculatedRisk who wrote (14145)	4/5/1998 7:39:00 PM
From: RumKola	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 31646

CR Some folks haven't questioned your expertise, but have asked questions about your expertise to gain information about apparent contradictions with reality, such as ..'there are no problems with monitoring equipment in the health care industry.' Are you going to help by clarifying, or are you just going on blathering about what an expert you are?????? JDP

To: CalculatedRisk who wrote (14145)	4/5/1998 8:29:00 PM
From: Money Mood	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 31646

Dear CR, With all due respect to your background and track record as a short-seller, I can't help saying that most of your posts on this thread lack substance. My feeling is that you are not trying to help anybody here, instead you assert your right to be short on TAVA (which would be ridiculous to question). Obviously, you don't share the belief of the thread that TAVA is worth investing on the long side - no need to reiterate the fact. You just don't believe. You know that, we know that - so what?! Let's keep that in mind and go back to business! If I may suggest: try to discover new facts about TAVA that would support your short position. Otherwise your belief is based solely on your perception of future market reactions - i.e. it is purely subjective. This thread has enough knowledge, experience and courage to face the reality. Viktor.

To: CalculatedRisk who wrote (14145)	4/5/1998 10:21:00 PM
From: B.D.Bauden	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 31646

"Cheryl, I'm surprised at the tone of your response and your use of profanity." Bill, It would appear that the name calling began when you referred to Cheryl as "the company lackey". That sounds like a gratuitous insult to me. Besides, why should you be surprised that someone would take a harsh tone with you when, according to the link you provided, there are people on SI that think you should be shot. You seem to have a talent for pissing people off. The credentials you lay claim to are impressive. How about behaving with the dignity of someone behind those accomplishments. Regards, Bruce