To: Chris McConnel who wrote (8847 ) 4/6/1998 12:45:00 PM From: Kashish King Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 64865
What X Window lacks is the ability to execute application code on the client. I've already explained that to you. Java was designed to fill that deficiency. It was designed as a secure, robust, portable, object-oriented system for distributed computing. Technically it's a solid choice. Politically , Java is an open standard with the blessing of ISO and 90% its 20 plus member countries versus being a proprietary holding of an operating system monopoly. Practically it's has the support of Sony, Motorola, IBM, Oracle, thousands of smaller companies and over half a million individual developers. Really, the only valid question you have is What is the value of executing code on the client device? , not whether Java is the best environment for doing which is a given for reasons I've already outlined. I am tempted to offer duh as an answer but let me continue. Java software is designed to control intelligent devices, not just dumb-ass monitors and dumb-ass keyboards. How the hell is the server supposed to control your device once it has interpreted a control function in your application? Moreover, the aggregate power of multiple client devices can quickly approach that of a large server, even a supercomputer. The idea is to leverage that power in a distributed manner such that clients handle localized issues locally. Note that they are adding printer support to Java which is an ass-backward but necessary step to leverage existing printer devices. BTW, Microsoft claimed, not long ago, that the notion of running any client software on the server was brain-dead. Clearly the notion of running all of your software on the server is brain-dead and myopic, but that's not what Java is about.