To: Bazmataz who wrote (18228 ) 4/6/1998 9:12:00 PM From: marc chatman Read Replies (5) | Respond to of 95453
Since thestreet.com belongs to Cramer, and since we know Cramer (by his own word) is not long the oil service sector, what is the possibility that he is painting the situation in the worst possible light in order to talk the group lower? I'm not saying he is or he isn't; I'm just looking at the possibility. Here is one statement, for example:The weekly Baker Hughes Rig Count, released Friday, indicated 43 fewer rigs drilling in the Gulf of Mexico against one year ago, highlighting concern about more marginal drilling projects in the Gulf. The number of rigs drilling for oil was down 89 last year, while the number of rigs drilling for gas was actually up 44 over last year. OK, what does this tell us about rig utilization rates? Nothing? If I recall correctly from Teddy's recent posts, aren't the GOM usage rates pretty consistent at about 96% (or something like that)? And isn't that up from last year. Also, the article starts by saying that Coastal isn't going to renew two ESV jack-ups. But for those who go on to read the article, I believe it says that of 3 jack-ups contracted to Coastal, one has been renewed, one is being shopped, and ESV is waiting to hear on one. Let's do the math Mavis. It could be true that ESV and others can't find work for their jack-ups. Or maybe it's not. I guess Coastal and all the other E&P's could go deeper, but there is a very limited supply of deepwater rigs. If they can't go deep, will they simply stop drilling for awhile? It's possible I guess. For disclosure, I'm long ESV (among others). Or as Cramer would say: "It's so painfully obvious that I'm long." <VBG> Comments anyone?