Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Non-Tech : Global Games Corporation is on the move (GLOW) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Brad who wrote (604)	4/6/1998 9:58:00 PM
From: Brad Morris	Respond to of 720

HEY BRAD YOU DID IT AGAIN!!!!!! THANKS A LOT FOR THE UPDATE! KEEP UP THE GOOD WORK. I WOULD BE LOST WITHOUT YOU! Brad Morris

To: Brad who wrote (604)	4/6/1998 11:04:00 PM
From: Wayne J.	Respond to of 720

Good Evening! Brad, The updated "General Overview Information" that you provided on a recent posting was appreciated and very timely in my opinion! Like most investors I am generally glad to see a growing following on companies that I have a vested interest in. I am glad to see that there are knowledgable investors like yourself, that continue to conduct first rate research and DD , even though on the odd / selected occassion we get some investors trying to jump the gun and move the cart ahead of the horse! Your updated overview helped me clearup any fuzzyness that may have surfaced on other threads today! Thanks for a well thought out opinion, and shared research that you provided, it is appreciated in more ways than you may at this point even realize! Thank You again Brad! Best regards, Wayne J.

To: Brad who wrote (604)	4/7/1998 12:21:00 AM
From: Wayne J.	Respond to of 720

Hello! Brad, I forgot to mention another GLOW item on my previous posting. A week or so ago I phoned GLOW Management and requested that they send me some information on the company. ( In my opinion, this is always a good start point to see if the company is receptive and reactive in a positive and proactive way with it's shareholders and other interested parties!)..... In my previous experiences, I have never had a very good response average with most OTC-BB Companies that I request information from! Some of them I have even requested the information three or four times and still haven't received! I am pleased to say that after only my initial request , today I received a mailing from GLOW!!!! ( Now! I live out in the Boonies on a small Island in British Columbia, so if it made it here in my impression, the GLOW management was interested in my investor request!) Before they sent me the information, I was reminded that the financials would not yet be included until the audits are completed! In my opinion, Fair enough! Each day in my opinion, I am gaining more confidence in my GLOW investment, and a growing feeling of confidence in the current GLOW Management! Looking forward to the days, weeks, and months ahead! Best Regards, Wayne J.

To: Brad who wrote (604)	4/7/1998 12:56:00 AM
From: Patrick Lauder	Respond to of 720

Thanks Brad, I am new to the thread and plan to buy GLOW tommorrow. I appreciate your research into the company. Could you please enlighten me: the company announcement makes it sound like ECS deal could fall apart yet you state it has already been purchased. Much appreciated, Pat

To: Brad who wrote (604)	4/7/1998 2:41:00 AM
From: Patrick Lauder	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 720

Brad It is early in the morning and I just finished reading previous posts of GLOW. I am still confused why you include ECS as part of GLOW's potential revenue when you did not include Wolf Key because of the possible pull out of the deal. Will there not be a pull out from ECS also or is that a done deal 100%. I will try to call the company today and hopefully I can post estimated revenues with the assumption all the deals as per their APRIL 1st announcement do fall thru, (which I understand as including ECS, WOLF KEY, & ICE). Also I will NOT include future purchases. This way we can see the (possible) worst case scenario of what revenues could be. Thanks Pat