Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Winspear Resources -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: peter bullock who wrote (5604)	4/6/1998 11:16:00 PM
From: Intrepid1	Respond to of 26850

Peter, that is one of the most informative and easy to understand posts I have ever read on Silicon Investor. Are you sure your not related to George or Walt? purething

To: peter bullock who wrote (5604)	4/7/1998 12:57:00 AM
From: The Fix	Respond to of 26850

Peter.....Welcome aboard the WSP thread! You've lurked too long my friend. I must second Purethings thoughts that your post was very informative and easy to read. Your analysis is splended! The grade will tell us the tale of the tape off of this Bulk sampling that's being processed now. I'm betting that we will have an economic resource on our hands. fIXER

To: peter bullock who wrote (5604)	4/7/1998 1:01:00 AM
From: Ratso	Respond to of 26850

Peter: I believe the last NR stated that the last hole , with a 2.8 m intersection, was a 400m stepout . Therefore , with dimensions of 1000m x 1000m , the tonnage could be considerably more than 3.3mt and still wide open... cheers Ratso

To: peter bullock who wrote (5604)	4/7/1998 7:34:00 AM
From: Mark Bartlett	Respond to of 26850

Peter, Excellent analysis .... I think there is a good chance we will end up with considerably more tonnage - but I like things on the conservative side at this stage. Don't be a lurker .... I suspect there are a few more pearls .... erhh diamonds of wisdom behind your keyboard <g> MB

To: peter bullock who wrote (5604)	4/7/1998 11:11:00 AM
From: Upick	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 26850

Peter, excellent post. If I may ask, where did you get the figure 2.7 tonnes/m3? Thanx in advance.

To: peter bullock who wrote (5604)	4/7/1998 9:00:00 PM
From: peter matson	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 26850

Just flew in to Webequie a remote community in northern Ontario and happened to speak to a driller for just a few moments. They were using a helicopter to transport the rig back to the airport since ice ice conditions are depleting and further drilling is not possible at this point. He stated that they had been drilling for diamonds and had intersected a number of kimberlite pipes however the diamond counts were not very good. The point being that dykes with good diamond counts are better than pipes with no diamonds. Good luck to all. Peter Matson